For law firms and IP advisors
The technical expert your firm calls when the dispute concerns software, trademarks or domains.
Lawyers need a technician who can write for a judge or a trademark examiner, not only for other technicians. I draft expert reports and party-appointed opinions on descriptiveness and weak trademark roots, software originality and authorship, and intangible asset value, with the rigour built in a precedent-setting case.
Typical cases
Real cases in this area, in the portfolio →Trademark oppositions and invalidity — UKIPO, USPTO/TTAB, EUIPO
Analysis of descriptiveness, weak roots and likelihood of confusion with the approach recognised in Shopify v EUIPO.
Software and code disputes
Expert report on originality, plagiarism, code authorship and contractual compliance of software deliveries.
Domains and online brands
Technical assessment of domains, digital brands and conflicts between domain names and registered marks, including UDRP.
Intangible asset valuation
Valuation of software, platforms and trademarks for contributions, transfers, due diligence and corporate disputes.
What you get
- Signed expert report ready for filing, in IT / EN / DE
- Descriptiveness and registrability analysis with precedents
- Technical report on software: architecture, authorship, originality
- Availability for clarifications, replies and hearings
Frequently asked questions
Can you act as party expert in ongoing litigation?
Yes. After reading the file we agree scope and timing with the firm; the quote is lump-sum or hourly.
Do you handle EUIPO and TTAB proceedings in English?
Yes. Shopify v EUIPO was handled in English, and the US record runs through the TTAB; most IP reports are delivered in EN.
How fast is the report delivered?
Standard IP audit: 7–10 working days. Litigation with procedural deadlines: aligned with the court calendar.